Thailand motorcycle rental business analysis

KTMphil

Senior member
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Location
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Bikes
2007 KTM 990 Adventure Suzuki DRZ 400
Had a quick look at the economics of a Chiang Mai motorcycle rental business model, looking at which motorcycles makes sense to rent.


Some simple assumptions of the rental motorcycle being bought new and sold with 50-60k km's on it as a rental motorcycle, so re-sale not top dollar.

This is a "gross" rental return analysis, doesnt allow for tires, oil, brake pads and other consumables. As they all have this, its almost a constant with Thai assembled and domestically sold bikes.

I added the deprecation back to the purchase price, then divided by the high season rental rate, to get to the return/ how many days rental to get the money back. (Added the depreciation back on, as if you could sell a certain model for the same you bought it for it would materially differ the return from say an ER6 which trade horribly second hand).

mc rental analysis by Triangle Golden 007, on Flickr


AS you can see the ER6 shows the best return, so the resale est. maybe too high. The Versys shows a return if you could sell it for over 200,000 bht with 50,000km at 237 days return.
 
Phil,

In my opinion you should take the cost price of the bike, deduct the depreciation so you get the actual costs, divide that by the daily rental charge and you know the amount of rental days to break even?!

Your table should look like this in my opinion:
Motorcycle
CostsDepreciationC MINUS DDay rentC-D/rental rate

in days
Suzuki Vstrom 650
385,000115,000270,0001,900142
Honda CB650F
285,00090,000195,0001,500130
Honda CB500X
220,00080,000140,0001,200117
Kawasaki Versys 650
313,00090,000223,0001,700131
Honda CRF250L
138,00065,00073,00080091
Honda CB300F
140,00060,00080,000800100
Triumph Bonneville
420,000100,000320,0002,000160
Kawasaki Z800375,000120,000255,0001,900134
Kawasaki ER6 650
275,000100,000175,0001,600109
 
Marcel, I did think about doing it that way but i dont think it reflects correct results. You dont get the "actual cost".

ie:

I spend 385,000 bht on a new Suzuki V Strom. That's my cash outlay i need to know how many days to get that investment back. By deducting the depreciation, you create an unrealistic return as you've adjusted your cash outlay down & not allowed for the cash you've lost on the sale of the bike. The more it depreciates under your method the more attractive the investment looks, so cant be right?


If I buy an Honda XR 250 for 75,000 Bht rent it for 700 Bht a day and sell it for 50,000 Bht. Doesn't give the same return as buying a Honda XR 250 for 50,000 Bht, renting it for 700 Bht a day and selling it for 50,000 Bht (what i paid for it)?
 
In fact you need to consider what you write off in your bookkeeping versus reality, the actual sales prices of the second hand bike.
Ideally the depreciation in your bookkeeping should be higher that the actual second hand value.
The depreciation can be deducted from taxes and the higher second hand sales value can be booked as a "profit".

Actually the thing to do is to divide the (cosmetically high) depreciation value by the daily rental rate to calculate your minimum amount of rental days to "break even"

Motorcycle
CostsDepreciationC MINUS DDay rentC-D/rental rateDepreciation /
in daysday rent
Suzuki Vstrom 650
385,000115,000270,0001,90014261
Honda CB650F
285,00090,000195,0001,50013060
Honda CB500X
220,00080,000140,0001,20011767
Kawasaki Versys 650
313,00090,000223,0001,70013153
Honda CRF250L
138,00065,00073,0008009181
Honda CB300F
140,00060,00080,00080010075
Triumph Bonneville
420,000100,000320,0002,00016050
Kawasaki Z800
375,000120,000255,0001,90013463
Kawasaki ER6 650
275,000100,000175,0001,60010963

 
Suzuki V Strom 650


Cash flow analysis:

Cost 385,000 / 1, 900 Bht a day = 202 days

Depreciation (cash lost) 115,000 / 1,900 = 61 days


Add the two -- 263 days as per my spreadsheet.
 
So you take the purchase price, add depreciation and write it off fully?
 
So you take the purchase price, add depreciation and write it off fully?

Because you are "rolling" the motorcycle investment into the new purchase ( & have less cash to invest in the new bike) I think you have to and you have to allow for the cash you have lost on the sale? The number of days to rent on purchase price gives a relative rate of return on your money invested.
 
Maybe easier to discuss by phone the next few days?
 
It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to get 1st class insurance for big bike rental purpose.
I know of one company only who committed to cover 500cc bikes for rentals but that plan never materialised so I am not sure how real their commitment was.
 
Back
Top Bottom